Clinical nutrition ESPEN · 2026
Explainable electronic medical record-based machine learning to predict 1-year incident Protein-Energy wasting in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease: A single-center development study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jiang Yuxuan, Xing Yunying, Li Zhixin, Li Ji, Wu Liyou, Wang Xiaojuan, Pei Tingting
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Protein-energy wasting (PEW) is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is linked to poor outcomes. Early risk stratification may enable timely nutritional intervention.
OBJECTIVE: To develop an electronic medical record (EMR)-based machine-learning model for 1-year incident CKD-PEW and report transparent, model-agnostic performance.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 500 adults with CKD managed between July 2019 and May 2021. Patients with PEW (defined by ISRNM criteria) at baseline were excluded. Thirty-one routine clinical/laboratory variables were used to train and evaluate five algorithms-logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree, random forest (RF), and LightGBM-under a random 75/25 split (382 training, 118 validation). Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), Brier score, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were used for interpretability.
RESULTS: On the hold-out validation set, the optimized Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) achieved the highest discrimination with an AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.99). The model also demonstrated excellent probability calibration with a Brier score of 0.095.
CONCLUSIONS: Using routine EMR data, we developed an explainable model that demonstrates high discrimination for predicting 1-year incident CKD-PEW on a hold-out validation set. The workflow provides a pragmatic foundation for subsequent independent validation, calibration assessment, and decision-curve analysis before clinical use.
CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ChiCTR2100046679.
OBJECTIVE: To develop an electronic medical record (EMR)-based machine-learning model for 1-year incident CKD-PEW and report transparent, model-agnostic performance.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 500 adults with CKD managed between July 2019 and May 2021. Patients with PEW (defined by ISRNM criteria) at baseline were excluded. Thirty-one routine clinical/laboratory variables were used to train and evaluate five algorithms-logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree, random forest (RF), and LightGBM-under a random 75/25 split (382 training, 118 validation). Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), Brier score, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were used for interpretability.
RESULTS: On the hold-out validation set, the optimized Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) achieved the highest discrimination with an AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.99). The model also demonstrated excellent probability calibration with a Brier score of 0.095.
CONCLUSIONS: Using routine EMR data, we developed an explainable model that demonstrates high discrimination for predicting 1-year incident CKD-PEW on a hold-out validation set. The workflow provides a pragmatic foundation for subsequent independent validation, calibration assessment, and decision-curve analysis before clinical use.
CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ChiCTR2100046679.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansElectronic Health RecordsRetrospective StudiesFemaleRenal Insufficiency, ChronicMachine LearningProtein-Energy MalnutritionMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsAgedRandom ForestBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsLogistic ModelsROC CurveSupport Vector MachineClassification AlgorithmsPrediction AlgorithmsRisk AssessmentIncidence