Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 1998
B-mode ultrasound assessment of pravastatin treatment effect on carotid and femoral artery walls and its correlations with coronary arteriographic findings: a report of the Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS).
Клиническое исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Groot E, Jukema J W, Montauban van Swijndregt A D, Zwinderman A H, Ackerstaff R G, van der Steen A F, Bom N, Lie K I, Bruschke A V
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: In this B-mode ultrasound study we assessed pravastatin treatment effects on carotid and femoral artery walls and investigated the correlations between the state and evolution of peripheral and coronary atherosclerosis.
BACKGROUND: The Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS) was an 11-center, 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective study of 885 men with coronary artery disease (CAD) (total cholesterol 4 to 8 mmol/liter). The study primarily investigated pravastatin treatment effects on the coronary lumen. This report focuses on the 255 patients who participated in the REGRESS ultrasound study.
METHODS: Carotid and femoral artery walls were imaged at baseline and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Pravastatin treatment effect was defined as the difference in progression of the combined intima-media thicknesses (IMT) between treatment groups.
RESULTS: Pravastatin treatment effects were highly significant (combined IMT: p = 0.0085; combined far wall IMT: p < 0.0001; common femoral artery far wall IMT: p = 0.004). Correlations between the IMTs of the arterial wall segments ranged from -0.17 to 0.81. Baseline correlations between IMT and percent coronary lumen stenoses ranged from 0.23 to 0.36. Baseline IMT correlated with the mean coronary segment diameter (r = -0.32, p = 0.001) and minimal coronary obstruction diameter (r = -0.27, p = 0.005). There were no individual correlations between IMT and coronary lumen variables (p > 0.30).
CONCLUSIONS: Pravastatin treatment effects on carotid and femoral artery walls were observed. B-mode ultrasound imaging studies of peripheral arterial walls could not describe the state and evolution of the coronary lumen in the individual patient, but proved to be a highly suitable tool for the assessment of antiatherosclerotic properties of agents.
BACKGROUND: The Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS) was an 11-center, 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective study of 885 men with coronary artery disease (CAD) (total cholesterol 4 to 8 mmol/liter). The study primarily investigated pravastatin treatment effects on the coronary lumen. This report focuses on the 255 patients who participated in the REGRESS ultrasound study.
METHODS: Carotid and femoral artery walls were imaged at baseline and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Pravastatin treatment effect was defined as the difference in progression of the combined intima-media thicknesses (IMT) between treatment groups.
RESULTS: Pravastatin treatment effects were highly significant (combined IMT: p = 0.0085; combined far wall IMT: p < 0.0001; common femoral artery far wall IMT: p = 0.004). Correlations between the IMTs of the arterial wall segments ranged from -0.17 to 0.81. Baseline correlations between IMT and percent coronary lumen stenoses ranged from 0.23 to 0.36. Baseline IMT correlated with the mean coronary segment diameter (r = -0.32, p = 0.001) and minimal coronary obstruction diameter (r = -0.27, p = 0.005). There were no individual correlations between IMT and coronary lumen variables (p > 0.30).
CONCLUSIONS: Pravastatin treatment effects on carotid and femoral artery walls were observed. B-mode ultrasound imaging studies of peripheral arterial walls could not describe the state and evolution of the coronary lumen in the individual patient, but proved to be a highly suitable tool for the assessment of antiatherosclerotic properties of agents.