Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2018
Prognostic value of the index of microcirculatory resistance after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Murai Tadashi, Yonetsu Taishi, Kanaji Yoshihisa, Usui Eisuke, Hoshino Masahiro, Hada Masahiro, Hamaya Rikuta, Kanno Yoshinori, Lee Tetsumin, Kakuta Tsunekazu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of physiological indices in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. We investigated the prognostic efficacy of physiological indices obtained after PCI in patients with NSTE-ACS.
METHODS: Eighty-three patients (men: n = 70, age: 63.7 ± 9.7 years) undergoing PCI for NSTE-ACS within 48 hr postadmission were investigated. Fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) of the culprit vessels were measured after the completion of PCI. The patients were clinically followed up to determine major cardiac adverse events (MACE), including death, congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization, and remote coronary revascularization.
RESULTS: The median FFR, CFR, and IMR values were 0.90 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.86-0.95), 2.38 (IQR 1.75-4.17), and 22.9 (IQR 11.2-31.5), respectively. During a median follow-up of 20.7 months, 19 MACEs (22.9%) were documented. No significant difference in baseline patient characteristics, except for age, was detected between patients with and without MACE. Patients with MACE showed higher IMR and lower CFR than those without (IMR: 27.2 vs. 16.3; P = 0.001, CFR: 1.82 vs. 2.55; P = 0.04), whereas FFR was not significantly different (0.92 vs. 0.89; P = 0.72), irrespective of the MACE occurrence. Post-PCI IMR was the only independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio 1.033, 95% confidence interval 1.013-1.052, P = 0.001). The MACE-free survival was significantly worse in patients with high post-PCI IMR (χ2 7.12; P = 0.008).
CONCLUSION: Post-PCI IMR may help identify patients at high risk for subsequent adverse coronary events who require adjunctive therapeutic strategies.
METHODS: Eighty-three patients (men: n = 70, age: 63.7 ± 9.7 years) undergoing PCI for NSTE-ACS within 48 hr postadmission were investigated. Fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) of the culprit vessels were measured after the completion of PCI. The patients were clinically followed up to determine major cardiac adverse events (MACE), including death, congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization, and remote coronary revascularization.
RESULTS: The median FFR, CFR, and IMR values were 0.90 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.86-0.95), 2.38 (IQR 1.75-4.17), and 22.9 (IQR 11.2-31.5), respectively. During a median follow-up of 20.7 months, 19 MACEs (22.9%) were documented. No significant difference in baseline patient characteristics, except for age, was detected between patients with and without MACE. Patients with MACE showed higher IMR and lower CFR than those without (IMR: 27.2 vs. 16.3; P = 0.001, CFR: 1.82 vs. 2.55; P = 0.04), whereas FFR was not significantly different (0.92 vs. 0.89; P = 0.72), irrespective of the MACE occurrence. Post-PCI IMR was the only independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio 1.033, 95% confidence interval 1.013-1.052, P = 0.001). The MACE-free survival was significantly worse in patients with high post-PCI IMR (χ2 7.12; P = 0.008).
CONCLUSION: Post-PCI IMR may help identify patients at high risk for subsequent adverse coronary events who require adjunctive therapeutic strategies.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Acute Coronary SyndromeAgedCardiac CatheterizationCoronary AngiographyFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansMaleMicrocirculationMiddle AgedNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRegistriesRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVascular Resistance