Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2016
Emergency Department Management of Transient Ischemic Attack: A Survey of Emergency Physicians.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oostema J Adam, Brown Michael D, Reeves Mathew
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patients are at high risk for stroke following a transient ischemic attack (TIA). The ideal setting for evaluating and treating patients with TIA has not been established, resulting in variability in emergency department (ED) TIA management. We conducted a survey to describe ED TIA management and factors that influence disposition determination for TIA patients.
METHODS: We administered a mail survey to 480 randomly selected members of the Michigan College of Emergency Physicians. Survey questions addressed current ED TIA management, the acceptability of the ABCD(2) risk-stratification tool, and disposition recommendations for a series of hypothetical TIA patients.
RESULTS: A total of 188 (39%) responses were received. Head computed tomography (96.2%) and antiplatelet therapy (88.2%) were the most commonly reported ED interventions. Over 85% of respondents reported admitting most or all TIA patients. The ABCD(2) score had low acceptability among emergency medicine physicians and was rarely incorporated into practice (10.7%). Respondents identified a short-term risk of stroke of less than 2% (95% confidence interval: 1.6-2.4) as an acceptable threshold for discharge; however, most respondents recommended admission even for low-risk TIA patients. Those with access to an outpatient TIA clinic were less likely to admit low-risk TIA patients; those with access to an observation unit were more likely to admit.
CONCLUSIONS: In this survey, ED physicians preferred hospital admission for most TIA patients, including those at low risk for stroke. The ABCD(2) risk-stratification tool had low acceptability. Further research is needed to refine risk-stratification tools and define the optimal setting for TIA evaluations.
METHODS: We administered a mail survey to 480 randomly selected members of the Michigan College of Emergency Physicians. Survey questions addressed current ED TIA management, the acceptability of the ABCD(2) risk-stratification tool, and disposition recommendations for a series of hypothetical TIA patients.
RESULTS: A total of 188 (39%) responses were received. Head computed tomography (96.2%) and antiplatelet therapy (88.2%) were the most commonly reported ED interventions. Over 85% of respondents reported admitting most or all TIA patients. The ABCD(2) score had low acceptability among emergency medicine physicians and was rarely incorporated into practice (10.7%). Respondents identified a short-term risk of stroke of less than 2% (95% confidence interval: 1.6-2.4) as an acceptable threshold for discharge; however, most respondents recommended admission even for low-risk TIA patients. Those with access to an outpatient TIA clinic were less likely to admit low-risk TIA patients; those with access to an observation unit were more likely to admit.
CONCLUSIONS: In this survey, ED physicians preferred hospital admission for most TIA patients, including those at low risk for stroke. The ABCD(2) risk-stratification tool had low acceptability. Further research is needed to refine risk-stratification tools and define the optimal setting for TIA evaluations.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultCerebral AngiographyComputed Tomography AngiographyDecision Support TechniquesEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHospitalistsHumansIschemic Attack, TransientMaleMichiganMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Risk AssessmentRisk FactorsStrokeTime FactorsTreatment Outcome