Outcomes and effectiveness of active surveillance for low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and effectiveness of active surveillance (AS) in patients with low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and compare them to those of immediate surgery (IS).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis, including 14 comparative studies and 7 noncomparative studies, was conducted, encompassing a total of 9,397 patients.

RESULTS

AS was associated with lower rates of familial history of thyroid cancer, multiplicity, and overall mortality compared to IS. The disease progression rate during AS was 14.53% (95% CI, 9.59-21.43%), and the delayed surgery rate was 14.91% (95% CI, 8.35-25.21%). No thyroid cancer-related mortality was observed in either the AS and IS groups. Clinicopathological characteristics showed no significant differences between delayed surgery and IS, except for higher rates of extrathyroidal extension and multiplicity in the delayed surgery group. Overall complication and recurrence rates were higher in the delayed surgery group than in the IS group. Quality of life and anxiety levels were similar between AS and IS, except for interest in sex, where AS was more beneficial.

CONCLUSION

AS is a feasible and reliable option for managing low-risk PTC, with a relatively low rate of disease progression and no thyroid cancer-related mortality. However, AS should be undertaken with caution, given the higher rates of overall complications and recurrence in the delayed surgery group compared to the IS group. Further studies with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up are needed to clarify the role and effectiveness of AS.