Cancer · 2026
Blood-based cell-free DNA and multitarget stool RNA screening tests to detect colorectal cancer: A systematic review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kondo Karli K, Shiau Rita L, Troutman Clarissa A B, Griffin Jessica C, Relevo Rose
Аннотация
Two new tests, a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) blood-based test (BBT) and multitarget stool RNA (mt-sRNA) test with in-laboratory fecal immunochemical testing, were recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, and a second BBT is under review. These tests have the potential to overcome barriers to screening. This review evaluates the current evidence to better understand their utility for routine screening. The authors searched PubMed, other databases, and gray literature sources through March 30, 2026. Included studies examined the diagnostic accuracy, harms, and the adherence to cfDNA and mt-sRNA screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC). One investigator abstracted data, and a second confirmed. Two investigators independently assessed the risk of bias and strength of evidence. Discords were resolved through consensus. From 262 titles, 12 studies (17 publications) were included. Three studies provide moderate strength evidence to support the performance characteristics of cfDNA, and one provides low strength evidence for mt-sRNA. For cfDNA, adjusted CRC and advanced precancerous lesions sensitivities ranged from 80.8% to 81.1% and from 12.9% to 13.7%, respectively, and advanced colorectal neoplasia specificity ranged from 89.5% to 90.4%. For mt-sRNA, CRC sensitivities were 93% and 48%, and observed specificity was 90%. No studies reported serious harms, and the evidence comparing adherence was insufficient. We found that cfDNA screening tests for CRC are similar, and although mt-sRNA estimates fall below those demonstrated by mt-sDNA, its in-laboratory fecal immunochemical testing, has the potential to increase adherence. Future research examining adherence is needed, as are data from which to examine their impact on underrepresented populations.