MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.02.006

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of surgery · 2011

Profiling adult intussusception patients: comparing colonic versus enteric intussusception.

Alexander Richard, Traverso Purnell, Bolorunduro Oluwaseyi B, Ortega Gezzer, Chang David, Cornwell Edward E, Fullum Terrence M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Adult intussusception is a rare entity representing 1% of all adult bowel obstruction, hospital admissions secondary to intussusception historically has ranged between .003% and .02%. There is limited knowledge regarding enteric and colonic surgical intussusception patients and their associated conditions.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted using data from the National Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2006. The inclusion criteria were surgical patients with intussusception.

RESULTS

A total of 1,178 cases of intussusception requiring surgery were isolated from the database. The mean patient age was 49.57 years, about 58% were females, 99.43% of this population was insured, and the overall mortality rate was 1.70%. Colonic resection was associated with greater mortality compared with the enteric resection group (P = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

This was a large study on surgical adult intussusception patients conducted in the United States. We show differences in demography, comorbidities, and potential causes between colonic and enteric intussusception.

Для цитирования: Alexander Richard, Traverso Purnell, Bolorunduro Oluwaseyi B, Ortega Gezzer, Chang David, Cornwell Edward E, Fullum Terrence M. Profiling adult intussusception patients: comparing colonic versus enteric intussusception.. American journal of surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.02.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.