MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bcr-2024-264024

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ case reports · 2026

Cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis with concurrent colitis of uncertain aetiology.

Yaw Vanessa Pei Xian, Korani Mohamed, Anowar Rakibul, Nadir Syed Mujtaba Hasnain

СтатьяКлинический случайПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This case presents a female in her 20s with biopsy-confirmed cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) and significant gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, manifesting as recurrent rectal bleeding, abdominal pain and maculopapular rash. The patient's symptoms emerged shortly after treatment with phenoxymethylpenicillin for tonsillitis. Investigations revealed left-sided colitis with distinctive endoscopic findings. Skin biopsy confirmed cutaneous LCV; however, colonic biopsies demonstrated non-specific inflammation without histological evidence of vasculitis. Therefore, GI vasculitic involvement could not be confirmed. Negative autoimmune serology excluded primary autoimmune disorders. Following treatment with prednisolone and mesalazine, the patient's symptoms resolved and she showed sustained improvement. While clinical improvement occurred after corticosteroid therapy, this response is non-specific and does not confirm GI vasculitis. Given the absence of vasculitic features on GI histology, the relationship between cutaneous LCV and colitis in this case remains associative rather than proven. This case underscores the importance of diagnostic caution when extracutaneous manifestations are suspected in LCV.

Для цитирования: Yaw Vanessa Pei Xian, Korani Mohamed, Anowar Rakibul, Nadir Syed Mujtaba Hasnain. Cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis with concurrent colitis of uncertain aetiology.. BMJ case reports. 2026. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2024-264024.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.