The New England journal of medicine · 1994
Loss of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene in parathyroid carcinoma.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cryns V L, Thor A, Xu H J, Hu S X, Wierman M E, Vickery A L, Benedict W F, Arnold A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The origin and molecular pathogenesis of parathyroid carcinoma are unknown. This life-threatening cause of primary hyperparathyroidism cannot be reliably distinguished from its benign counterpart on the basis of histopathological features alone. Because the PRAD1, or cyclin D1, gene, a cell-cycle regulator, has been implicated in a subgroup of benign parathyroid tumors, we examined the possibility that another cell-cycle regulator with possible functional links to PRAD1, the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene (RB), might be involved in the molecular pathogenesis of parathyroid carcinoma.
METHODS: Parathyroid carcinomas from 9 patients and adenomas from 21 were studied for evidence of tumor-specific loss of RB gene DNA (allelic loss) by analysis of four DNA polymorphisms and for evidence of altered expression oF RB protein by immunohistochemical staining.
RESULTS: All of 11 specimens from 5 patients with parathyroid carcinoma and informative DNA patterns and 1 of 19 specimens from 19 patients with parathyroid adenoma and informative DNA patterns lacked an RB allele. Fourteen of 16 specimens (88 percent) from the nine patients with carcinoma had abnormal expression of RB protein (a complete or predominant absence of nuclear staining for the protein). None of the 19 adenomas, including the tumor with loss of an RB allele, had unequivocally abnormal staining for RB protein.
CONCLUSIONS: Inactivation of the RB gene is common in parathyroid carcinoma and is likely to be an important contributor to its molecular pathogenesis. The presence of such inactivation may help to distinguish benign from malignant parathyroid disease and may have useful diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications.
METHODS: Parathyroid carcinomas from 9 patients and adenomas from 21 were studied for evidence of tumor-specific loss of RB gene DNA (allelic loss) by analysis of four DNA polymorphisms and for evidence of altered expression oF RB protein by immunohistochemical staining.
RESULTS: All of 11 specimens from 5 patients with parathyroid carcinoma and informative DNA patterns and 1 of 19 specimens from 19 patients with parathyroid adenoma and informative DNA patterns lacked an RB allele. Fourteen of 16 specimens (88 percent) from the nine patients with carcinoma had abnormal expression of RB protein (a complete or predominant absence of nuclear staining for the protein). None of the 19 adenomas, including the tumor with loss of an RB allele, had unequivocally abnormal staining for RB protein.
CONCLUSIONS: Inactivation of the RB gene is common in parathyroid carcinoma and is likely to be an important contributor to its molecular pathogenesis. The presence of such inactivation may help to distinguish benign from malignant parathyroid disease and may have useful diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications.