MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Revista espanola de cardiologia · 2002

[Does abciximab improve the prognosis of diabetics after percutaneous coronary intervention?].

Hernández García José María, Domínguez Franco Antonio, Jiménez-Navarro Manuel F, Alonso Briales Juan H, Curiel Balsera Emilio, Gómez Doblas Juan J, De Teresa Galván Eduardo

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION AND

OBJECTIVES

It is known that the outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention is worse in diabetics than in non-diabetics. The aim of our study was to determine whether abciximab therapy could improve clinical outcome in an unselected diabetic population that underwent percutaneous coronary interventions.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

We analyzed retrospectively 198 diabetic patients who underwent PTCA from January 1997 to January 2000. Seventy-three patients (36.7%) were treated with abciximab and the remaining 125 patients (63.3%) did not receive abciximab. The mean follow-up was 12.6 months. The events considered were death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, any revascularization procedure (including the target vessel), and hospital admission for unstable angina.

RESULTS

Patients who received abciximab had more frequent previous myocardial infarction (67.1 vs. 52.8%; p = 0.04), worse left ventricular function (0.53 vs. 0.59%; p = 0.02), more frequent angiographic thrombus (67.1 vs. 36.8%; p < 0.001), more complex lesions (B2/C) (76.4 vs. 55.8%; p = 0.004), and less frequent location in left anterior descending artery (34.2 vs. 60.8%; p = 0.002). The indication for PTCA in patients who received abciximab was most often related to myocardial infarction. There were no differences between the groups in sex, age and distribution of diabetes treatment. Events were more frequent in diabetics not treated with abciximab than in those who were treated with abciximab (38 vs. 22%; p < 0.037). The patients not treated with abciximab suffered more frequently target vessel revascularization (22.7 vs. 7.2%; p < 0.007). There were no significant differences in the frequency of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction, but hospital readmissions for unstable angina were significantly more frequent in diabetics not treated with abciximab (29.1 vs. 15.9%; p = 0.045). Multivariate analysis identified abciximab as a predictor of the absence of complications during follow-up (OR: 0.45; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Abciximab treatment seems to reduce events in unselected diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, particularly target vessel revascularization.

Для цитирования: Hernández García José María, Domínguez Franco Antonio, Jiménez-Navarro Manuel F, Alonso Briales Juan H, Curiel Balsera Emilio, Gómez Doblas Juan J, De Teresa Galván Eduardo. [Does abciximab improve the prognosis of diabetics after percutaneous coronary intervention?].. Revista espanola de cardiologia. 2002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.