MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/icu.0b013e3281377209

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2007

Value-based medicine and interventions for macular degeneration.

Brown Melissa M, Brown Gary C, Brown Heidi

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this article is to review the patient value conferred by interventions for neovascular macular degeneration.

RECENT FINDINGS: Value-based medicine is the practice of medicine based upon the patient value (improvement in quality of life and length of life) conferred by an intervention. For ophthalmologic interventions, in which length-of-life is generally unaffected, the value gain is equivalent to the improvement in quality of life. Photodynamic therapy delivers a value gain (improvement in quality of life) of 8.1% for the average person with classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization, while laser photocoagulation for the same entity confers a 4.4% improvement in quality of life. Preliminary data suggest the value gain for the treatment of occult/minimally classic choroidal neovascularization with ranibizumab is greater than 15%. The average value gain for statins for the treatment of hyperlipidemia is 3.9%, while that for the use of biphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis is 1.1% and that for drugs to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia is 1-2%.

SUMMARY: Interventions, especially ranibizumab therapy, for neovascular macular degeneration appear to deliver an extraordinary degree of value compared with many other interventions across healthcare.

Для цитирования: Brown Melissa M, Brown Gary C, Brown Heidi. Value-based medicine and interventions for macular degeneration.. Current opinion in ophthalmology. 2007. DOI: 10.1097/icu.0b013e3281377209.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.