MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1586/17434440.2015.1054807

Медицинская библиотека · Expert review of medical devices · 2015

Comparative effectiveness of Mitraclip plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in high-risk surgical patients: a comprehensive review.

Gonzalez Fernando Matias, Finch Aureliano Paolo, Armeni Patrizio, Boscolo Paola Roberta, Tarricone Rosanna

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

In recent years, Mitraclip has become available as a treatment option for mitral regurgitation in high-risk surgical patients. Focusing on the incremental effectiveness of Mitraclip versus the current standard of care, this article provides a comparative review of the evidence on Mitraclip and standard medical therapy (MT) in high-risk mitral regurgitation patients. Evidence was retrieved from seven major databases. Results suggest that Mitraclip presents a high safety profile and a good middle-term effectiveness performance. Evidence on long-term effectiveness is limited both for Mitraclip and MT. Few studies allow a comparison with MT and comparative results on different endpoints are mixed. Therefore, the available evidence does not conclusively inform whether or under which circumstances Mitraclip should be preferred over MT in the treatment of high-risk patients. Head-to-head real-world studies would be needed, as they would provide great and timely insights to support policy decisions when medical devices are at stake.

Для цитирования: Gonzalez Fernando Matias, Finch Aureliano Paolo, Armeni Patrizio, Boscolo Paola Roberta, Tarricone Rosanna. Comparative effectiveness of Mitraclip plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in high-risk surgical patients: a comprehensive review.. Expert review of medical devices. 2015. DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2015.1054807.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.