Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2021
QTc interval on 24-hour holter monitor: To trust or not to trust?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tamr Agha Mhd Khalil, Fakhri Ghina, Ahmed Mohamed, El Sedawy Omar, Abi Saleh Bernard, Bitar Fadi, Arabi Mariam
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: QT interval represents the ventricular depolarization and repolarization. Its accurate measurement is critical since prolonged QT can lead to sudden cardiac death. QT is affected by heart rate and is corrected to QTc via several formulae. QTc is commonly calculated on the ECG and not the 24-h Holter.
METHODS: 100 patients presenting to our institution were evaluated by an ECG followed by a 24-h Holter. QTc measurement on both platforms using Bazett and Fridericia formulae was recorded and compared.
RESULTS: Mean age was 14.09 years, with the majority being males. Mean heart rate was 125.87. In the ECG, the mean QTc interval via the Bazett formula was 0.40 s compared with 0.38 s using the Fridericia formula. The mean corrected QT via the Bazett formula was 0.45, 0.39, and 0.42 s for the shortest RR, the longest RR, and the average RR, respectively. In contrast to the Fridericia formula, the corrected QT interval was 0.40, 0.39, and 0.40 s for the shortest RR, the longest RR, and the average RR, respectively. Using the Bazett formula, the highest specificity was reached during the longest RR interval (92.2%), while the highest sensitivity was recorded during the shortest RR interval (40%). As for the Fridericiaformula, sensitivity always reached 0%, while the highest specificity was reached during the average RR interval.
CONCLUSION: QTc measured during Holter ECG reached a high specificity regardless of RR interval using the Fridericia and during the longest and the average RR interval for the Bazett formula. The consistently low sensitivity reveals that Holter ECG should not be used to rule out prolonged QT.
METHODS: 100 patients presenting to our institution were evaluated by an ECG followed by a 24-h Holter. QTc measurement on both platforms using Bazett and Fridericia formulae was recorded and compared.
RESULTS: Mean age was 14.09 years, with the majority being males. Mean heart rate was 125.87. In the ECG, the mean QTc interval via the Bazett formula was 0.40 s compared with 0.38 s using the Fridericia formula. The mean corrected QT via the Bazett formula was 0.45, 0.39, and 0.42 s for the shortest RR, the longest RR, and the average RR, respectively. In contrast to the Fridericia formula, the corrected QT interval was 0.40, 0.39, and 0.40 s for the shortest RR, the longest RR, and the average RR, respectively. Using the Bazett formula, the highest specificity was reached during the longest RR interval (92.2%), while the highest sensitivity was recorded during the shortest RR interval (40%). As for the Fridericiaformula, sensitivity always reached 0%, while the highest specificity was reached during the average RR interval.
CONCLUSION: QTc measured during Holter ECG reached a high specificity regardless of RR interval using the Fridericia and during the longest and the average RR interval for the Bazett formula. The consistently low sensitivity reveals that Holter ECG should not be used to rule out prolonged QT.