Perimitral atrial tachycardias dependent on residual nonligament of Marshall conduction.

INTRODUCTION

Catheter ablation for perimitral atrial tachycardia (PMAT) that persists despite lateral mitral isthmus (LMI) ablation is challenging. The aim of this study was to identify the role of the ligament of Marshall (LOM) in PMATs that persist after LMI conduction block has been created, and evaluate the validity of ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (VOM) as treatment.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

Sixteen consecutive PMATs in 13 patients that persisted despite apparent LMI conduction block, which was confirmed by ultrahigh-resolution mapping and entrainment pacing along the mitral annulus, were analyzed. PMATs were classified into two types based on the location of the endocardial breakthrough site: those utilizing the LOM (n = 13), which had a breakthrough site along with the LOM, and those not utilizing the LOM (n = 3), which had a breakthrough site at an anterior or posterior side of the LOM. Of the 16 PMATs, 5 PMATs (31%) were not suitable for ethanol infusion into the VOM because the LOM was not involved in the tachycardia circuit or because of the anatomy of the VOM. Fourteen PMATs (88%) were successfully terminated solely by breakthrough site ablation. At a mean follow-up period of 12 ± 9 months, 10 (77%) patients have remained free from atrial tachyarrhythmias.

CONCLUSION

In cases of PMAT following LMI ablation, epicardial conduction over the LMI can occur independently of the LOM. Ethanol infusion into the VOM in such cases would not abolish residual epicardial conduction. The anatomy of the VOM can also preclude the use of this method.