Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry · 2020
Clinical and laboratory features associated with myeloperoxidase expression in pediatric B-lymphoblastic leukemia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McGinnis Eric, Yang David, Au Nicholas, Morrison Douglas, Chipperfield Kate M, Setiadi Audi F, Liu Lorraine, Tsang Angela, Vercauteren Suzanne M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common childhood malignancy, and its diagnosis requires immunophenotypically demonstrating blast B cell lineage differentiation. Expression of myeloperoxidase (MPO) in B-ALL is well-described and it has been recognized that a diagnosis of mixed phenotype acute leukemia should be made cautiously if MPO expression is the sole myeloid feature in these cases. We sought to determine whether MPO expression in pediatric B-ALL was associated with differences in laboratory, immunophenotypic, or clinical features.
METHODS: We reviewed clinical, diagnostic bone marrow flow cytometry, and laboratory data for all new B-ALL diagnoses at our pediatric institution in 5 years. Cases were categorized as MPO positive (MPO+) or negative (MPO-) using a threshold of ≥20% blasts expressing MPO at intensity greater than the upper limit of normal lymphocytes on diagnostic bone marrow flow cytometry.
RESULTS: A total of 148 cases were reviewed, 32 of which (22%) were MPO+. MPO+ B-ALL was more frequently hyperdiploid and less frequently harbored ETV6-RUNX1; no MPO+ cases had KMT2A rearrangements or BCR-ABL1. Although not significantly so, MPO+ B-ALL was less likely than MPO- B-ALL to have positive end-of-induction minimal residual disease studies (9.4 and 24%, respectively), but relapse rates and stem cell transplantation rates were similar between groups. Aberrant expression of other more typically myeloid markers was similar between these groups.
CONCLUSION: In our study cohort, MPO+ B-ALL showed minimal residual disease persistence less often after induction chemotherapy but otherwise had similar clinical outcomes to MPO- B-ALL, with similar rates of additional myeloid antigen aberrancy.
METHODS: We reviewed clinical, diagnostic bone marrow flow cytometry, and laboratory data for all new B-ALL diagnoses at our pediatric institution in 5 years. Cases were categorized as MPO positive (MPO+) or negative (MPO-) using a threshold of ≥20% blasts expressing MPO at intensity greater than the upper limit of normal lymphocytes on diagnostic bone marrow flow cytometry.
RESULTS: A total of 148 cases were reviewed, 32 of which (22%) were MPO+. MPO+ B-ALL was more frequently hyperdiploid and less frequently harbored ETV6-RUNX1; no MPO+ cases had KMT2A rearrangements or BCR-ABL1. Although not significantly so, MPO+ B-ALL was less likely than MPO- B-ALL to have positive end-of-induction minimal residual disease studies (9.4 and 24%, respectively), but relapse rates and stem cell transplantation rates were similar between groups. Aberrant expression of other more typically myeloid markers was similar between these groups.
CONCLUSION: In our study cohort, MPO+ B-ALL showed minimal residual disease persistence less often after induction chemotherapy but otherwise had similar clinical outcomes to MPO- B-ALL, with similar rates of additional myeloid antigen aberrancy.