MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/cid/ciaf260

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026

Contamination of Blood Cultures Drawn From Arterial Catheters Versus Venipuncture or Venous Catheters in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Koroki Takatoshi, Fujii Motoki, Kotani Yuki, Yaguchi Takahiko, Shibata Taisuke, Hirata Chihiro, Okawa Naoki, Ota Koshi, Tonai Mayuko, Karumai Toshiyuki, Kataoka Yuki, Hayashi Yoshiro

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Arterial catheter-drawn blood culture sampling may reduce patient discomfort and healthcare providers' workload. Guidelines discourage transcatheter blood culture collection due to contamination risks, mainly derived from data on venous catheter-drawn cultures. However, contamination rates of arterial catheter-drawn cultures have not been comprehensively evaluated compared with venipuncture- or venous catheter-drawn cultures.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception through 5 December 2023, for studies comparing arterial catheter-drawn blood cultures with venipuncture- or venous catheter-drawn blood cultures. The primary outcome was blood culture contamination rate. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis and evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.

RESULTS

We included 6 studies involving 8533 blood cultures. When comparing arterial catheter- with venipuncture-drawn cultures, the crude contamination rates were 28/1355 (2.1%) and 103/4539 (2.3%), respectively. Arterial catheter-drawn cultures may not increase contamination rates compared to venipuncture-drawn cultures (risk difference [RD], 0.01 [95% confidence interval {CI}, -.01 to .02]; low certainty). When comparing arterial catheter- with venous catheter-drawn cultures, the crude contamination rates were 15/489 (3.1%) and 211/2639 (8.0%), respectively. Compared to venous catheter-drawn cultures, arterial catheter-drawn cultures may have lower contamination rates (RD, -0.05 [95% CI, -.11 to .01]; low certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients, arterial catheter-drawn blood cultures may have contamination rates comparable to venipuncture-drawn cultures and potentially lower than venous catheter-drawn cultures.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42023486227).

Для цитирования: Koroki Takatoshi, Fujii Motoki, Kotani Yuki, Yaguchi Takahiko, Shibata Taisuke, Hirata Chihiro, Okawa Naoki, Ota Koshi, Tonai Mayuko, Karumai Toshiyuki, Kataoka Yuki, Hayashi Yoshiro. Contamination of Blood Cultures Drawn From Arterial Catheters Versus Venipuncture or Venous Catheters in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2026. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaf260.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.