The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ · 2014
MitraClip implantation for high risk patients with severe mitral regurgitation: the Sheba experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koifman Edward, Fefer Paul, Hay Ilan, Feinberg Micha, Maor Elad, Guetta Victor
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair using the MitraClip system has evolved as a new tool in the treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR).
OBJECTIVES: To present our initial experience with MitraClip implantation in 20 high risk patients at Sheba Medical Center.
METHODS: Twenty high surgical risk patients with symptomatic significant MR underwent MitraClip implantation. Clinical and echocardiographic parameters were recorded at baseline and at follow-up.
RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 76 years and 65% were male. Coronary artery disease was present in 85% and 45% ent in had previous bypass surgery. Renal failure was present in 65%, atrial fibrillation in 60%, and 30% had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy device. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 36%. Grade III-IV MR was present in all patients with the vast majority suffering from functional MR secondary to ventricular remodeling. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class was III-IV in 90%. Patients were followed for a mean of 231 days. Acute reduction of MR grade to < or = 2 was accomplished in 19 of the 20 patients (95%) with a 30 day mortality of 5%. At follow-up MR was reduced to < or = 2 in 64% of patients, and NYHA class improved in 70% of patients. An additional 2 patients (11%) died during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: MitraClip implantation is feasible and safe in high risk highly symptomatic patients with significant MR. Acute and mid-term results are comparable to similar high risk patient cohorts in the literature. Continued surveillance and longer follow-up are needed to elucidate which patients are most likely to benefit from the procedure.
OBJECTIVES: To present our initial experience with MitraClip implantation in 20 high risk patients at Sheba Medical Center.
METHODS: Twenty high surgical risk patients with symptomatic significant MR underwent MitraClip implantation. Clinical and echocardiographic parameters were recorded at baseline and at follow-up.
RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 76 years and 65% were male. Coronary artery disease was present in 85% and 45% ent in had previous bypass surgery. Renal failure was present in 65%, atrial fibrillation in 60%, and 30% had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy device. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 36%. Grade III-IV MR was present in all patients with the vast majority suffering from functional MR secondary to ventricular remodeling. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class was III-IV in 90%. Patients were followed for a mean of 231 days. Acute reduction of MR grade to < or = 2 was accomplished in 19 of the 20 patients (95%) with a 30 day mortality of 5%. At follow-up MR was reduced to < or = 2 in 64% of patients, and NYHA class improved in 70% of patients. An additional 2 patients (11%) died during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: MitraClip implantation is feasible and safe in high risk highly symptomatic patients with significant MR. Acute and mid-term results are comparable to similar high risk patient cohorts in the literature. Continued surveillance and longer follow-up are needed to elucidate which patients are most likely to benefit from the procedure.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansIsraelMaleMitral ValveMitral Valve AnnuloplastyMitral Valve InsufficiencyOutcome Assessment, Health CareProsthesis DesignRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexStroke VolumeSurvival AnalysisUltrasonography