DOI 10.1016/j.acvd.2013.03.059
Initial French experience of percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip: a multicentre national registry.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Percutaneous mitral valve repair (MVR) using the MitraClip(®) is a new option for severe mitral regurgitation (MR).
AIM: To describe initial French experience regarding short-term and mid-term safety and efficacy.
METHODS
A multicentre cohort reported experience of percutaneous MVR using the MitraClip(®) in French centres from December 2010 to September 2012. All patients were judged inoperable or at high surgical risk. Short-term and mid-term safety and efficacy results are presented.
RESULTS
Sixty-two patients (72.7±11.4years; 71.7% men; 81.0% New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III or IV; logistic Euroscore 18.7±13.1%; 93.3% MR≥grade 3; 73.8% secondary MR) underwent percutaneous MVR using the MitraClip(®) under general anaesthesia. Procedural success was 95.2% (83.1% of patients received one clip; 16.9% received two clips). At discharge, 88.2% of implanted patients had a residual MR≤grade 2. Transthoracic echocardiography showed a significant decrease in ejection fraction (39.9±14.8% pre vs. 36.2±14.3% post), end-diastolic diameter (63.8±10.6mm vs. 61.4±12.3mm, respectively) and systolic pulmonary pressure (52.1±13.9mmHg vs. 44.7±10.9mmHg, respectively). The in-hospital mortality rate was 3.2%. The survival rate at 6-month follow-up was estimated at 83.1%, with 90.9% of patients in NYHA class I or II and residual MR≤grade 2 in 80% of cases.
CONCLUSION
This initial French experience, despite being in its learning phase, showed promising results in patients considered ineligible for surgery, as observed in more experienced centres. Randomized studies are mandatory to confirm these preliminary data.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.