DOI 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.03.046
Incidence and predictors of the late catch-up phenomenon after drug-eluting stent implantation.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Although clinical restenosis within 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention has been remarkably reduced with the advent of drug-eluting stents (DES), the late catch-up (LCU) phenomenon remains an issue despite medical advances. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and predictive factors of the LCU phenomenon in an unselected population treated with first-generation DES.
METHODS
A total of 923 patients treated with DES between June 2004 and August 2008 were analyzed. The LCU phenomenon was defined as secondary revascularization 1 year after index stenting. Retreatment for very late stent thrombosis was considered as part of the LCU phenomenon.
RESULTS
Incidence of the LCU phenomenon was seen in 33 patients (3.6%). Very late stent thrombosis was observed in 5 patients (0.6%) and very late in-stent restenosis was observed in 28 patients (3.0%). At the 12-month landmark analysis, the cumulative rate of cardiac death was significantly higher in patients with the LCU phenomenon than in those without any target lesion revascularization (9.0% vs. 0.9%, p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, hemodialysis [odds ratio (OR) 6.07, p=0.003], number of stents (OR 1.58, p=0.02), and coronary bifurcation lesions (OR 2.06, p=0.048) were identified as independent predictors of the LCU phenomenon.
CONCLUSION
The LCU phenomenon is associated with serious consequences and adverse events and remains an important issue in modern practice, despite medical advances. DES should be deployed with a minimum number of stents, and special consideration must be given to patients on hemodialysis and those with coronary bifurcation lesions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.