DOI 10.1007/s00062-025-01516-5
Hippocampal Subfield Vulnerability and Functional Connectivity in Cognitive Decline: a Comparison Between Parkinson's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the shared and distinct alterations in hippocampal subfield atrophy and functional connectivity (FC) in Parkinson's disease (PD) with normal cognition (PD-NC), PD with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) and unspecified MCI (U-MCI).
METHODS
A total of 294 participants were included from two centers (30 PD-NC, 86 PD-MCI, 76 U-MCI, and 102 healthy controls (HC)). Comparisons of hippocampal subfield volumes were conducted among groups. Seed-based FC was calculated to assess abnormalities between hippocampal subfields and cortical regions.
RESULTS
Compared to HC, PD-NC group showed volumetric reductions in the right cornu ammonis (CA) 2/3, granule cell layer of the dentate gyrus (GC-DG), and CA4 subfields, while PD-MCI group exhibited bilateral volumetric reductions in the same subfields. PD-MCI patients exhibited increased FC between the bilateral GC-DG/CA4 subfield and the posterior default mode network (pDMN), as well as between the right GC-DG/CA4 subfield and the calcarine, in comparison to PD-NC. U‑MCI patients displayed smaller volume in the right CA4 compared to HC. Decreased FC of the hippocampus with the widespread visual network was observed in the PD-MCI group compared to the U‑MCI group.
CONCLUSIONS
PD-MCI is associated with structural vulnerability of hippocampal subfields in the CA2/3, GC-DG, and CA4 subfields, impacting FC with pDMN and visual network. Smaller scope of hippocampal subfields atrophy but weaker hippocampus-visual network FC abnormalities in U‑MCI relative to PD-MCI may suggest distinct progression mechanisms between these two conditions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.