Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2022
Does the Glenoid Fossa Change Following Orthognathic Surgery?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Holte Michael Boelstoft, Nielsen Trine Wulff, Sæderup Henrik, Pinholt Else Marie
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Glenoid fossa morphology may change following orthognathic surgery and may subsequently affect skeletal stability and functionality, however hardly documented. Hence, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the morphological change of the glenoid fossa 2 years after bimaxillary surgery.
METHODS: A case series was performed including subjects diagnosed with maxillary and/or mandibular growth disturbances, who underwent bimaxillary surgery between March 2012 and November 2017 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark. The study variables were gender, age, and postoperative condylar resorption. Subjects were sampled evenly within subgroups with and without postoperative condylar resorption. The outcome variable, three-dimensional morphological change of the glenoid fossa, was calculated as surface distance in mm between superimposed preoperative and postoperative (2 years) cone-beam computed tomography scans, and the glenoid fossa was spatially divided into 4 regions. Evaluation of glenoid fossa changes of more than one voxel (>0.3 mm) and comparison of subjects with and without postoperative condylar resorption were performed by one-sample and unpaired t tests, respectively.
RESULTS: Twenty subjects (16 women; 4 men; mean age = 27.6 years) with Class II malocclusion and maxillomandibular retrognathia were included. The glenoid fossa changes (0.36 mm) were significant (P = .021) and significantly larger in subjects with condylar resorption than in those without condylar resorption in the anterior-lateral (0.40 mm vs 0.27 mm, P = .021) and anterior-medial fossa region (0.48 mm vs 0.26 mm, P = .015).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant morphological fossa changes were found 2 years after orthognathic surgery, and subjects with postoperative condylar resorption showed a significantly higher degree of morphological change in the anterior glenoid fossa than subjects without postoperative condylar resorption.
METHODS: A case series was performed including subjects diagnosed with maxillary and/or mandibular growth disturbances, who underwent bimaxillary surgery between March 2012 and November 2017 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark. The study variables were gender, age, and postoperative condylar resorption. Subjects were sampled evenly within subgroups with and without postoperative condylar resorption. The outcome variable, three-dimensional morphological change of the glenoid fossa, was calculated as surface distance in mm between superimposed preoperative and postoperative (2 years) cone-beam computed tomography scans, and the glenoid fossa was spatially divided into 4 regions. Evaluation of glenoid fossa changes of more than one voxel (>0.3 mm) and comparison of subjects with and without postoperative condylar resorption were performed by one-sample and unpaired t tests, respectively.
RESULTS: Twenty subjects (16 women; 4 men; mean age = 27.6 years) with Class II malocclusion and maxillomandibular retrognathia were included. The glenoid fossa changes (0.36 mm) were significant (P = .021) and significantly larger in subjects with condylar resorption than in those without condylar resorption in the anterior-lateral (0.40 mm vs 0.27 mm, P = .021) and anterior-medial fossa region (0.48 mm vs 0.26 mm, P = .015).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant morphological fossa changes were found 2 years after orthognathic surgery, and subjects with postoperative condylar resorption showed a significantly higher degree of morphological change in the anterior glenoid fossa than subjects without postoperative condylar resorption.