MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Collegium antropologicum · 2010

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma misdiagnosed as palatal odontogenic infection: an overview on the differential diagnosis of palatal lesions.

Brajdić Davor, Virag Mihajlo, Manojlović Spomenka, Luksić Ivica, Franćeski Dalibor, Biocić Josip, Bosan-Kilibarda Ingrid, Zajc Ivan, Macan Darko

Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) accounts for approximately 30% of malignant salivary gland tumors and approximately 30% occur in minor salivary glands. The palate is the most frequent localization for those arising in minor glands. A 33-year-old male patient with MEC of the hard palate was treated as an acute odontogenic infection, which was not cured after tooth endodontic treatments, repeated incisions and antibiotics. On the hard palate ovoid, a hard painless mass, which had not extended over the middle palatal line, was observed. Partial maxillectomy was performed. A review of the literature was performed in order to provide a coherent overview on the differential diagnosis of palatal lesions. To the best of authors' knowledge, this is the first report in English literature describing palatal MEC misdiagnosed and treated as odontogenic infection. Considering the extensive list of MEC's differential diagnoses on the hard palate, acute odontogenic infection can now be added to that list.

Для цитирования: Brajdić Davor, Virag Mihajlo, Manojlović Spomenka, Luksić Ivica, Franćeski Dalibor, Biocić Josip, Bosan-Kilibarda Ingrid, Zajc Ivan, Macan Darko. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma misdiagnosed as palatal odontogenic infection: an overview on the differential diagnosis of palatal lesions.. Collegium antropologicum. 2010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.