Der Radiologe · 1996
[Comparison between direct radiographic enlargement and mammography technique in detection of osseous changes of the hand skeleton in hyperparathyroidism].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Müller-Miny H, Link T, Braun-Anhalt I, Dietl K H, Peters P E
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare direct magnification radiography and mammographic film-screen systems in osseous changes of the hand in hyperparathyroidism.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The hands of 60 patients who were suspected to have primary (5), secondary or tertiary (both 55) hyperparathyroidism were evaluated with direct magnification radiography and a mammographic film-screen system (S12.5). Posterior-anterior views of each hand were obtained with both techniques. The magnification radiographs were made with a focal spot size of 40 or 60 microns, digital luminescence radiography (S600/1200), and a x 6 or 8 magnification. The 240 films were evaluated for subperiosteal, intracortical and endosteal resorptive changes by five radiologists using a grading according to five levels of confidence.
RESULTS: A significant improvement (p < 0.05) in the diagnosis of periosteal and intracortical bone resorption was shown, but no significant changes in endosteal resorption with direct magnification radiography. As compared to mammographic film-screen systems, magnification radiography improved the diagnostic accuracy (24%). The time needed for the evaluation of periosteal and intracortical bone resorption was shortened with direct magnification radiography (-4%/ -15%), and the time for giving the diagnosis decreased (-10%).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The hands of 60 patients who were suspected to have primary (5), secondary or tertiary (both 55) hyperparathyroidism were evaluated with direct magnification radiography and a mammographic film-screen system (S12.5). Posterior-anterior views of each hand were obtained with both techniques. The magnification radiographs were made with a focal spot size of 40 or 60 microns, digital luminescence radiography (S600/1200), and a x 6 or 8 magnification. The 240 films were evaluated for subperiosteal, intracortical and endosteal resorptive changes by five radiologists using a grading according to five levels of confidence.
RESULTS: A significant improvement (p < 0.05) in the diagnosis of periosteal and intracortical bone resorption was shown, but no significant changes in endosteal resorption with direct magnification radiography. As compared to mammographic film-screen systems, magnification radiography improved the diagnostic accuracy (24%). The time needed for the evaluation of periosteal and intracortical bone resorption was shortened with direct magnification radiography (-4%/ -15%), and the time for giving the diagnosis decreased (-10%).