European heart journal · 2006
Diagnosing familial hypercholesterolaemia: the relevance of genetic testing.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Aalst-Cohen Emily S, Jansen Angelique C M, Tanck Michael W T, Defesche Joep C, Trip Mieke D, Lansberg Peter J, Stalenhoef Anton F H, Kastelein John J P
Аннотация
AIMS: We assembled a cohort of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) for both basic and clinical research. We used a set of established diagnostic criteria to define FH. Some put forward that a definite diagnosis of FH is made when a mutation in the LDL-receptor (LDLR) gene is identified. We therefore set out to determine in these patients whether patients with a DNA diagnosis would differ significantly from those diagnosed clinically.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly selected 4000 hypercholesterolaemic patients from the Dutch Lipid Clinic network database. Phenotypical data were acquired by reviewing medical records. After review of medical records, 2400 patients could be defined as having FH. An LDLR mutation was identified in 52.3% of these patients. Patients with and without an LDLR mutation demonstrated different clinical and laboratory characteristics. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was higher in patients with an LDLR mutation, whereas triglycerides were higher in patients without an LDLR mutation. The phenotypic differences between the groups remained even after stratification for the presence or absence of tendon xanthomas.
CONCLUSION: Despite the use of stringent clinical criteria to define FH patients, two cohorts could be identified within our study population, namely those patients with and those without an LDLR mutation. Our findings suggest that among those without an LDLR mutation, patients with other causes of dyslipidaemia may be present. These observations underline the relevance of genetic testing in FH for clinical practice, for screening purposes, and for research involving these patients.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly selected 4000 hypercholesterolaemic patients from the Dutch Lipid Clinic network database. Phenotypical data were acquired by reviewing medical records. After review of medical records, 2400 patients could be defined as having FH. An LDLR mutation was identified in 52.3% of these patients. Patients with and without an LDLR mutation demonstrated different clinical and laboratory characteristics. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was higher in patients with an LDLR mutation, whereas triglycerides were higher in patients without an LDLR mutation. The phenotypic differences between the groups remained even after stratification for the presence or absence of tendon xanthomas.
CONCLUSION: Despite the use of stringent clinical criteria to define FH patients, two cohorts could be identified within our study population, namely those patients with and those without an LDLR mutation. Our findings suggest that among those without an LDLR mutation, patients with other causes of dyslipidaemia may be present. These observations underline the relevance of genetic testing in FH for clinical practice, for screening purposes, and for research involving these patients.