MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/asj/sjw107

Медицинская библиотека · Aesthetic surgery journal · 2016

Subplatysmal Necklift: A Retrospective Analysis of 504 Patients.

Auersvald André, Auersvald Luiz A, Oscar Uebel Carlos

СтатьяVideo-Audio MediaПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Improvement of neck contour is a primary goal of patients who seek rejuvenation of the face and neck. Subplatysmal structures, including fat, the digastric muscle, and the submandibular salivary glands (SMSGs), may contribute to the appearance of a disproportionately large neck.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and predictability of necklift combined with reshaping and repositioning of the subplatysmal structures.

METHODS

The records of 504 patients were reviewed retrospectively. Surgical maneuvers for subplatysmal necklift were described comprehensively and supplemented with videos. The subplatysmal anatomy was detailed by means of 2 cadaver dissections.

RESULTS

A total of 430 patients (85.3%) underwent subplatysmal necklift. The most commonly treated structures were fat (423 patients [83.9%]), the SMSGs (307 patients [60.9%]), and the digastric muscle (91 patients [18.1%]). The most common complications were weakness of the lower lip depressor (29 patients [5.7%]), followed by sialoma of the parotid gland (10 patients [2%]). No patients experienced subplatysmal hematoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Subplatysmal necklift is a safe, effective, and reliable option for patients who desire improved cervical contour.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Therapeutic.

Для цитирования: Auersvald André, Auersvald Luiz A, Oscar Uebel Carlos. Subplatysmal Necklift: A Retrospective Analysis of 504 Patients.. Aesthetic surgery journal. 2016. DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjw107.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.