The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery · 1997
Cervical spine injury in maxillofacial trauma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lalani Z, Bonanthaya K M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To find out the incidence of associated facial injuries and injuries to the cervical spine.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Teaching hospital, India.
SUBJECTS: 536 patients treated for maxillofacial injuries between January 1992 and November 1993.
INTERVENTIONS: Review of hospital case notes and radiographs.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Coexisting facial and cervical spine injuries, morbidity and mortality.
RESULTS: 16 patients (3%) had sustained both facial and cervical spine injuries. There were 14 men (median age 40, range 21-64) and 2 women (aged 19 and 30). In 10 of the 16 patients the cause of the injury was a road traffic accident. In 11 patients the facial injury was to the soft tissue only, in 4 it was to both hard and soft tissue, and in 1 it was to hard tissue only. Soft tissue damage to the midface was more likely to be associated with injuries in the area of C5-7 and that to the lower third of the face was more likely to be associated with damage to the upper cervical spine. 11 patients had neurological deficits as a result of their injuries and 2 died.
CONCLUSION: If diagnosis and treatment of simultaneous facial and cervical spine injuries are to be improved, further study of the biomechanics of injury is necessary.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Teaching hospital, India.
SUBJECTS: 536 patients treated for maxillofacial injuries between January 1992 and November 1993.
INTERVENTIONS: Review of hospital case notes and radiographs.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Coexisting facial and cervical spine injuries, morbidity and mortality.
RESULTS: 16 patients (3%) had sustained both facial and cervical spine injuries. There were 14 men (median age 40, range 21-64) and 2 women (aged 19 and 30). In 10 of the 16 patients the cause of the injury was a road traffic accident. In 11 patients the facial injury was to the soft tissue only, in 4 it was to both hard and soft tissue, and in 1 it was to hard tissue only. Soft tissue damage to the midface was more likely to be associated with injuries in the area of C5-7 and that to the lower third of the face was more likely to be associated with damage to the upper cervical spine. 11 patients had neurological deficits as a result of their injuries and 2 died.
CONCLUSION: If diagnosis and treatment of simultaneous facial and cervical spine injuries are to be improved, further study of the biomechanics of injury is necessary.