Annals of surgery · 2022
Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Adenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction Between Esophageal and Gastric Adenocarcinomas.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Suh Yun-Suhk, Na Deukchae, Lee Ju-Seog, Chae Jeesoo, Kim EuiHyun, Jang Giyong, Lee Jieun, Min Jimin, Ock Chan-Young, Kong Seong-Ho, George Joshy, Zhang Chengsheng, Lee Hyuk-Joon, Kim Jong-Il, Kim Seong-Jin, Kim Woo Ho, Lee Charles, Yang Han-Kwang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the molecular characteristics of AGEJ compared with EAC and gastric adenocarcinoma.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Classification of AGEJ based on differential molecular characteristics between EAC and gastric adenocarcinoma has been long-standing controversy but rarely conducted due to anatomical ambiguity and epidemiologic difference.
METHODS: The molecular classification model with Bayesian compound covariate predictor was developed based on differential mRNA expression of EAC (N = 78) and GCFB (N = 102) from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. AGEJ/cardia (N = 48) in TCGA cohort and AGEJ/upper third GC (N = 46 pairs) in Seoul National University cohort were classified into the EAC-like or GCFB-like groups whose genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic characteristics were compared.
RESULTS: AGEJ in both cohorts was similarly classified as EAC-like (31.2%) or GCFB-like (68.8%) based on the 400-gene classifier. The GCFB-like group showed significantly activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase-AKT signaling with decreased expression of ERBB2. The EAC-like group presented significantly different alternative splicing including the skipped exon of RPS24, a significantly higher copy number amplification including ERBB2 amplification, and increased protein expression of ERBB2 and EGFR compared with GCFB-like group. High-throughput 3D drug test using independent cell lines revealed that the EAC-like group showed a significantly better response to lapatinib than the GCFB-like group (P = 0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: AGEJ was the combined entity of the EAC-like and GCFB-like groups with consistently different molecular characteristics in both Seoul National University and TCGA cohorts. The EAC-like group with a high Bayesian compound covariate predictor score could be effectively targeted by dual inhibition of ERBB2 and EGFR.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Classification of AGEJ based on differential molecular characteristics between EAC and gastric adenocarcinoma has been long-standing controversy but rarely conducted due to anatomical ambiguity and epidemiologic difference.
METHODS: The molecular classification model with Bayesian compound covariate predictor was developed based on differential mRNA expression of EAC (N = 78) and GCFB (N = 102) from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. AGEJ/cardia (N = 48) in TCGA cohort and AGEJ/upper third GC (N = 46 pairs) in Seoul National University cohort were classified into the EAC-like or GCFB-like groups whose genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic characteristics were compared.
RESULTS: AGEJ in both cohorts was similarly classified as EAC-like (31.2%) or GCFB-like (68.8%) based on the 400-gene classifier. The GCFB-like group showed significantly activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase-AKT signaling with decreased expression of ERBB2. The EAC-like group presented significantly different alternative splicing including the skipped exon of RPS24, a significantly higher copy number amplification including ERBB2 amplification, and increased protein expression of ERBB2 and EGFR compared with GCFB-like group. High-throughput 3D drug test using independent cell lines revealed that the EAC-like group showed a significantly better response to lapatinib than the GCFB-like group (P = 0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: AGEJ was the combined entity of the EAC-like and GCFB-like groups with consistently different molecular characteristics in both Seoul National University and TCGA cohorts. The EAC-like group with a high Bayesian compound covariate predictor score could be effectively targeted by dual inhibition of ERBB2 and EGFR.