Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2004
Prophylaxis of port system-associated thromboses in advanced oncology patients using heparin flushing.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lersch C, Kotowa W, Fung S, Janssen D
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Thromboses occur in connection with the use of venous port systems. Valid data on the instillation of heparin-based solutions in the lumen of the port system are lacking.
METHODS: One hundred and seventy-three patients with malignancy from 19 centres who had participated in an observation study of subcutaneous thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin-Na (Fragmin P/-Forte) were analysed with a view to flushing the port systems and investigating any related influence on the occurrence of catheter-associated thromboses.
RESULTS: All catheter-associated thromboses were seen in centres which used either no UFH, or UFH concentrations of up to 250 IU/ml (8/108; 7.4%). The rate of thrombosis rose to 10% (6/60) if no high-risk dose of dalteparin was applied subcutaneously. On the other hand, the rate of catheter-associated thromboses under the high-risk dose of dalteparin and/or a more highly concentrated instillation fluid, at 0.9% (1/113), was much lower. One haemorrhage from gastric ulcer occurred under the highest UFH concentration in the instillation fluid (2,500 IU UFH/ml).
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that a concentration between 500 IU UFH/ml and 1,000 IU UFH/ml in the instillation solution, at the same time as high-risk prophylaxis with subcutaneous dalteparin for prevention of catheter-associated thromboses, is effective in patients with manifest tumour disease. The instillation of LMWH-based solutions at a concentration of approx 500 anti-Xa units/ml should be discussed as a pending issue.
METHODS: One hundred and seventy-three patients with malignancy from 19 centres who had participated in an observation study of subcutaneous thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin-Na (Fragmin P/-Forte) were analysed with a view to flushing the port systems and investigating any related influence on the occurrence of catheter-associated thromboses.
RESULTS: All catheter-associated thromboses were seen in centres which used either no UFH, or UFH concentrations of up to 250 IU/ml (8/108; 7.4%). The rate of thrombosis rose to 10% (6/60) if no high-risk dose of dalteparin was applied subcutaneously. On the other hand, the rate of catheter-associated thromboses under the high-risk dose of dalteparin and/or a more highly concentrated instillation fluid, at 0.9% (1/113), was much lower. One haemorrhage from gastric ulcer occurred under the highest UFH concentration in the instillation fluid (2,500 IU UFH/ml).
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that a concentration between 500 IU UFH/ml and 1,000 IU UFH/ml in the instillation solution, at the same time as high-risk prophylaxis with subcutaneous dalteparin for prevention of catheter-associated thromboses, is effective in patients with manifest tumour disease. The instillation of LMWH-based solutions at a concentration of approx 500 anti-Xa units/ml should be discussed as a pending issue.