MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7860/jcdr/2014/7971.4829

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2014

Oral Hygiene Practices and Dentition Status of Public Transport Workers of India- A Cross-sectional Study.

Gambhir Ramandeep Singh, Sohi Ramandeep Kaur, Singh Gurminder, Brar Rajdeep, Singh Harpreet, Kakar Heena

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the oral hygiene practices and dentition statuses of transport workers who were working in a public bus transport system (C.T.U.) of Chandigarh (U.T.), India.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The data were recorded on a modified W.H.O. format (1997). A total of 1008 subjects constituted the final sample size. Information was obtained regarding the oral hygiene practices and clinical examinations were conducted. Statistical analysis was done by using ANOVA and Z-test.

RESULTS

The mean age of the subjects was 45.3 ± 7.8 years. Mean DMFT of the subjects who were not using tobacco in any form was 5.02. 80.2% (808). 88.7% of the subjects brushed their teeth as least once a day. Mean number of decayed and missing teeth were 1.67 ± 2.16 and 1.46 ± 2.8, respectively and their relation with age was found to be statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Dental caries was found to be major indication in all the age groups. More elderly subjects than young needed extractions. This study emphasized the need of an improved dental awareness and availability of dental facilities to transport workers.

Для цитирования: Gambhir Ramandeep Singh, Sohi Ramandeep Kaur, Singh Gurminder, Brar Rajdeep, Singh Harpreet, Kakar Heena. Oral Hygiene Practices and Dentition Status of Public Transport Workers of India- A Cross-sectional Study.. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR. 2014. DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2014/7971.4829.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.