Evaluating the influence of dental post diameter on treatment outcome: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

This study systematically reviewed the impact of post diameter on treatment outcomes in endodontically treated teeth. MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The review followed the PRISMA guidelines, and a systematic search was conducted in the databases from 1975 to 2024. Publications were searched in PubMed, Wiley Online Library, EBSCOhost, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. A total of five studies were selected for inclusion after the screening process; three of which were cohort studies, one was prospective, and two case-control studies were included in the results. Data and outcome variables were extracted and checked for risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool. FINDINGS: Studies that reported a decreased risk for failure and an increased survival rate for restorations with posts of greater diameter had a moderate risk of bias. Two studies reported a greater risk for complications resulting from an increase in post diameter and a reduction in remaining dentin thickness, but had a serious risk of bias. One study, in particular, reported an improvement in the survival rate of abutments upon increasing the post diameter; however, after a certain point, any increase led to the survival rate dropping by almost half.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence—largely from non-randomized studies—shows no clear association between post diameter and treatment survival, and remains limited by heterogeneity, risk of bias, and inadequate control of confounding factors.