Evaluation of the effect of prior antiarrhythmic drug use on the success of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.
Аннотация
WHAT IS KNOWN AND
OBJECTIVE
Current guidelines recommend catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic drug (AAD), but do not specify an adequate number of AADs to be trialed prior to considering ablation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of CA success based on the number of AADs failed in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF.
METHODS
This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF who underwent an initial CA at a community hospital. Patients with unknown AAD histories, those who did not achieve acute procedural success, or who were lost to follow-up or death unrelated to thromboembolic stroke within 6 months post-ablation were excluded. Catheter ablation success was defined as freedom from AF. The primary outcome was the incidence of AF or atrial flutter captured on an electrocardiogram or other recording device at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the procedure.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Overall, 99 out of 103 patients completed 1 year of follow-up. Of those patients, 34 of 99 (34.3%) experienced AF recurrence within 1-year post-ablation. There was no significant difference among the categories of number of failed AADs and the recurrence of AF within 12 months post-ablation for zero AADs, 1 AADs and ≥2 AADs (41.7%, 31.3% and 40%, respectively; P = 0.658).
WHAT IS NEW AND
CONCLUSION
The results of this study do not support preferentially performing CA on patients who have failed a certain number of AADs. Results are limited by the nature of the study design and a small sample size. Conclusive results would best be addressed by a prospective randomized trial.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.