Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia · 2003
Surgical removal of a dislocated lower third molar from the condyle region: case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wassouf A, Eyrich G, Lebeda R, Grätz K W
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Migration of dislocated lower third molar into the condylar region is quite rare. Attention should be taken to avoid condyle fracture.
METHODS: 49-year-old patient had an ectopic lower left third molal in the condylar region, suffered from a submandibular and masseter space abscess. Removal of the molar via intraoral approach was chosen avoiding facial nerve branches and unnecessary scar formation. Coronoid process is removed, the tooth is separated and removed. The defect is filled with iliac cancellous bone. The coronoid process was fixed as a cover with a resorbable plate and screws (BIONX).
RESULTS: Removal via intraoral approach is possible. Hypesthesia existed postoperatively, became normal later.
CONCLUSION: Annual observation is strongly recommended. Intraoral approach is superior to the extraoral approach. Removal of the coronoid process minimizes the masticator forces. Separation of the tooth is essential. Filling the defect with cancellous bone accelerates the healing.
METHODS: 49-year-old patient had an ectopic lower left third molal in the condylar region, suffered from a submandibular and masseter space abscess. Removal of the molar via intraoral approach was chosen avoiding facial nerve branches and unnecessary scar formation. Coronoid process is removed, the tooth is separated and removed. The defect is filled with iliac cancellous bone. The coronoid process was fixed as a cover with a resorbable plate and screws (BIONX).
RESULTS: Removal via intraoral approach is possible. Hypesthesia existed postoperatively, became normal later.
CONCLUSION: Annual observation is strongly recommended. Intraoral approach is superior to the extraoral approach. Removal of the coronoid process minimizes the masticator forces. Separation of the tooth is essential. Filling the defect with cancellous bone accelerates the healing.