MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2005.06.012

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric neurology · 2006

Immunoglobulin for concurrent Guillain-Barré and immune thrombocytopenic purpura.

Zeidman Lawrence A, Fahey Christopher D, Grinblatt David L, Harsanyi Krisztina

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Guillain-Barré syndrome, or acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, and immune thrombocytopenic purpura are both autoimmune disorders thought to result from molecular mimicry in response to an antecedent introduction of foreign antigen. Guillain-Barré syndrome is an ascending motor paralysis that can lead to respiratory compromise. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura is an isolated disorder of platelet destruction leading to mucocutaneous bleeding. Guillain-Barré does not typically occur with other autoimmune disorders, and concurrent Guillain-Barré and immune thrombocytopenic purpura has only rarely been reported. We present a patient with both conditions who experienced prompt resolution of neurologic and hematologic sequelae after intravenous immunoglobulin therapy was initiated within 12 hours of presentation. The case provides further evidence that Guillain-Barré syndrome and immune thrombocytopenic purpura can occur simultaneously, possibly caused by a similar pathogenic mechanism, as well as suggesting that the prompt initiation of intravenous immunoglobulin is an effective monotherapy leading to prompt resolution of both conditions and prevention of further sequelae.

Для цитирования: Zeidman Lawrence A, Fahey Christopher D, Grinblatt David L, Harsanyi Krisztina. Immunoglobulin for concurrent Guillain-Barré and immune thrombocytopenic purpura.. Pediatric neurology. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2005.06.012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.