MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2169/internalmedicine.41.270

Медицинская библиотека · Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2002

Prognostic significance of the number of leads with ST depression during an anginal attack in high risk patients with unstable angina.

Saitoh Makoto, Kondoh Teruo, Wakao Kyoko, Kitamura Kazuhisa, Nomoto Shigeru, Matsuo Koh, Yamada Akira, Yanagawa Tetsuo

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE AND

METHODS

We examined the prognostic significance of electrocardiographic predictors (number of leads with ST depression, maximal ST depression, QT dispersion), C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, myosin light chain 1 and creatine kinase MB fraction in 62 patients with unstable angina showing ST depression during an anginal attack.

RESULTS

During the 90-day follow-up period, 15 patients (24%) exhibited new cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction or urgent revascularization). Using multivariate analysis, the number of leads with ST depression [relative risk 6.305 (95% confidence intervals 1.831-21.71), p<0.01] during an anginal attack was found to be an independent risk factor to predict cardiac events. Other predictors did not have prognostic significance.

CONCLUSION

The number of leads with ST depression during an anginal attack is an independent risk predictor for new cardiac events in high risk patients with unstable angina.

Для цитирования: Saitoh Makoto, Kondoh Teruo, Wakao Kyoko, Kitamura Kazuhisa, Nomoto Shigeru, Matsuo Koh, Yamada Akira, Yanagawa Tetsuo. Prognostic significance of the number of leads with ST depression during an anginal attack in high risk patients with unstable angina.. Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan). 2002. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.41.270.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.