[Long term outcome in patients with and without restenosis after coronary angioplasty].

Restenosis at dilatation site still constitutes a significant limitation of percutaneous coronary revascularisation. Majority of patients with restenosis are treated with repeat angioplasty, although its impact on long-term outcome is still little known > Very few studies focused on this issue bring rather discrepant results. The present study is aimed at assessing the impact of restenosis on long-term outcome in patients treated with coronary angioplasty. A group of 567 patients, who in the years 1987-1996 had successfully undergone percutaneous balloon coronary angio-plasty (PTCA) at our Clinic, was retrospectively divided into two groups: a group comprising 188 patients (33.2%) suffering from recurrent angina in whom restenosis had been established through control angiography, and a group comprising 379 patients (66.8%) who during the observation period exhibited no angina symptoms, or in whom the control angiography did not reveal restenosis. The restenotic patients were older (p = 0.007), more frequently exhibited symptoms of unstable angina upon PTCA (p < 0.0001), and there were also fewer smokers among them (p = 0.02). Furthermore, restenotic patients more frequently had multivessel and multilesion angioplasty (p = 0.025; p = 0.004, respectively). Restenosis after the first PTCA was treated by repeated angioplasty in 149 (79.3%) patients, 26 (13.8%) underwent CABG operation and 13 (6.9%) patients were treated pharmacologically without repeated revascularization. Within the 5-year observation period the mortality rate in both groups did not differ significantly (5.9% vs. 4.0%). Restenotic patients sustained myocardial infarctions more frequently (8.0% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.01), had significant atherosclerosis progression (37.2% vs. 15.0%, p < 0.0001), and were more frequently subjected to repeated interventions (37.2% vs. 15.0%, p < 0.0001), both PTCA (79.3% vs. 11.6% p < 0.0001) and CABG surgery (32.5% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.0001), as well as to multiple re-interventions (31.9% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.0001), in comparison with the non-restenotic ones. Analysis of functional status of patients assessed in compliance with the CCS criteria at the end of the observation period proved that significantly more non-restenotic patients did not experience angina, or experienced it rather sporadically (CCS Class 0 and 1). Logistic regression uni- and multivariate analysis proved that restenosis is an independent risk factor of myocardial infarction, reinterventions--also multiple ones--and cardiac events, although not mortality.