MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/b978-0-323-90120-8.00011-3

Медицинская библиотека · Handbook of clinical neurology · 2024

History of cellular grafting for central nervous system repair-A clinical perspective.

Lindvall Olle

СтатьяИсторическая статьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

As late as in the 1970s, the evidence supporting that brain function might be restored by replacing dead cells by transplantation of new healthy cells was scarce in experimental animals and lacking in humans. Repairing the human brain was regarded as completely unrealistic by clinicians. Fifty years later, the situation is very different, and cellular grafting has reached patient application in several conditions affecting the CNS. The clinical studies performed so far have shown that cellular grafts can survive, grow, and function also in the diseased adult human brain. However, no proven treatment based on cell transplantation is currently available for any brain disorder. Here, the history of cellular grafting is described from a clinical perspective, including some of the preclinical work that has formed the basis for its translation to patient application. The focus is on cell transplantation for Parkinson disease, which in many ways is paving the way for this field of research. The chapter gives an account of the scientific milestones, the ups and downs, as well as the positive and negative reactions from the scientific and clinical community, and how this research field despite many obstacles has continued to move forward over more than four decades.

Для цитирования: Lindvall Olle. History of cellular grafting for central nervous system repair-A clinical perspective.. Handbook of clinical neurology. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-90120-8.00011-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.