Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2001
Long-term clinical outcome and predictors of major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous interventions on saphenous vein grafts.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Keeley E C, Velez C A, O'Neill W W, Safian R D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term clinical outcome after percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) and to identify the predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous interventions of SVGs have been associated with more procedural complications and higher restenosis rates compared with interventions on native vessels.
METHODS: From 1993 to 1997, 1,062 patients underwent percutaneous intervention on 1,142 SVG lesions. Procedural, in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes were recorded in a database and analyzed.
RESULTS: In-hospital MACE occurred in 137 patients (13%) including death (8%), Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) (2%) and coronary artery bypass surgery (3%). Late MACE occurred in 565 patients (54%) including death (9%), Q-wave MI (9%) and target vessel revascularization (36%). Any MACE occurred in 457 (43%) patients. Follow-up was available in 1,056 (99%) patients at 3 +/- 1 year. Univariate predictors were restenotic lesion (odds ratio [OR]: 2.47, confidence interval [CI]: 1.13 to 3.85, p = 0.0003), unstable angina (OR: 1.99, CI: 1.27 to 2.91, p = 0.04) and congestive heart failure (CHF) (OR: 1.97, CI: 1.14 to 3.24, p = 0.02) for in-hospital MACE, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (OR: 2.18, CI: 1.34 to 3.44, p = 0.002), intra-aortic balloon pump placement (OR: 2.08, CI: 1.13 to 3.85, p = 0.02) and previous MI (OR: 1.97, CI: 1.14 to 3.25, p = 0.007) for late MACE. Independent multivariate predictors for late MACE were restenotic lesion (relative risk [RR] 1.33, p = 0.02), PVD (RR: 1.31, p = 0.01), CHF (RR: 1.42, p = 0.01) and multiple stents (RR: 1.47, p = 0.004). Angiographic follow-up was available for 422 patients. Angiographic restenosis occurred in 122 (29%) of stented SVGs and 181 (43%) of nonstented SVGs (p = 0.04). Stent implantation did not confer a survival benefit.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the use of new interventional devices, SVG interventions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality; SVG stenting is not associated with better three-year event-free survival. This may be due to progressive disease at nonstented sites.
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous interventions of SVGs have been associated with more procedural complications and higher restenosis rates compared with interventions on native vessels.
METHODS: From 1993 to 1997, 1,062 patients underwent percutaneous intervention on 1,142 SVG lesions. Procedural, in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes were recorded in a database and analyzed.
RESULTS: In-hospital MACE occurred in 137 patients (13%) including death (8%), Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) (2%) and coronary artery bypass surgery (3%). Late MACE occurred in 565 patients (54%) including death (9%), Q-wave MI (9%) and target vessel revascularization (36%). Any MACE occurred in 457 (43%) patients. Follow-up was available in 1,056 (99%) patients at 3 +/- 1 year. Univariate predictors were restenotic lesion (odds ratio [OR]: 2.47, confidence interval [CI]: 1.13 to 3.85, p = 0.0003), unstable angina (OR: 1.99, CI: 1.27 to 2.91, p = 0.04) and congestive heart failure (CHF) (OR: 1.97, CI: 1.14 to 3.24, p = 0.02) for in-hospital MACE, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (OR: 2.18, CI: 1.34 to 3.44, p = 0.002), intra-aortic balloon pump placement (OR: 2.08, CI: 1.13 to 3.85, p = 0.02) and previous MI (OR: 1.97, CI: 1.14 to 3.25, p = 0.007) for late MACE. Independent multivariate predictors for late MACE were restenotic lesion (relative risk [RR] 1.33, p = 0.02), PVD (RR: 1.31, p = 0.01), CHF (RR: 1.42, p = 0.01) and multiple stents (RR: 1.47, p = 0.004). Angiographic follow-up was available for 422 patients. Angiographic restenosis occurred in 122 (29%) of stented SVGs and 181 (43%) of nonstented SVGs (p = 0.04). Stent implantation did not confer a survival benefit.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the use of new interventional devices, SVG interventions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality; SVG stenting is not associated with better three-year event-free survival. This may be due to progressive disease at nonstented sites.