MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2217/fca.14.53

Медицинская библиотека · Future cardiology · 2014

Preoperative evaluation before MitraClip®: present and future perspective.

Salerno Gemma, Schmidt Frank Patrick, Bigazzi Maurizio Cappelli, Sordelli Chiara, Bianchi Renato, Golino Paolo, Calabrò Paolo, Russo Maria Giovanna, Calabrò Raffaele, Pacileo Giuseppe

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the second most common heart valve disease worldwide. Currently, the management of MR is based on medical therapy (including biventricular pacing), surgery (mitral valve replacement or repair) and percutaneous therapy. However, in spite of guideline recommendations, 50% of individuals assessed in the Euro Heart Survey were not referred to surgical intervention due to comorbidities or real or perceived high risks for cardiac surgery; thus, in recent years, the focus of research has shifted to the development of percutaneous approaches to treat severe MR in order to restore valve function in a minimally invasive fashion. Among these techniques, the percutaneous mitral valve repair procedure using the MitraClip(®) system (Abbott Vascular, IL, USA) is one of the most promising. Usually, patient selection for MitraClip implantation is based on careful echocardiographic assessment of valve disease; however, although definitive data are lacking, evidence is mounting for a multiparametric approach including the evaluation of the functional status of patients.

Для цитирования: Salerno Gemma, Schmidt Frank Patrick, Bigazzi Maurizio Cappelli, Sordelli Chiara, Bianchi Renato, Golino Paolo, Calabrò Paolo, Russo Maria Giovanna, Calabrò Raffaele, Pacileo Giuseppe. Preoperative evaluation before MitraClip®: present and future perspective.. Future cardiology. 2014. DOI: 10.2217/fca.14.53.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.