DOI 10.1007/s00405-021-06969-1
Petrous bone cholesteatoma: our experience of 20 years and management of two giant cases affecting rhinopharynx.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To demonstrate our experience in the treatment of petrous bone cholesteatoma (PBC).
METHODS
Data of PBC patients in our hospital from January 2000 to December 2019 were collected. Surgical approaches and facial function were mainly discussed and compared with the literature. The management of 2 giant PBC cases affecting rhinopharynx has been demonstrated.
RESULTS
The supralabyrinthine type was the most frequent type followed by the massive type. There were 5 cases with cholesteatoma extending into the clivus (2 cases), sphenoid (1 case) and rhinopharynx (2 cases). The translabyrinthine approach (40%) was our most frequently used approach followed by the middle fossa approach (36%) and the transmastoid approach (11%). There were 10 cases managed with the assistance of endoscope, including 3 cases with cholesteatoma extending into clivus, sphenoid and rhinopharynx separately. Obliteration of the cavity was performed in 70.3% (135/192) cases; 3 of them recurred. For the 2 giant PBC cases affecting rhinopharynx, traditional microscopic surgery assisted with transnasal endoscope was performed. The reduced exposure was beneficial for postoperative recovery, and the approach in the nasal cavity provided a permanent drainage for postoperative examination.
CONCLUSION
Otologic endoscope combined with traditional microscopic surgery could reduce the exposure in surgery. For extremely extended cases of PBC, supplementary transnasal endoscopic approach deserves to be considered for the traditional temporal bone approach.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.