Khirurgiia · 2025
[Factors of delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Оригинал на русском
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Suvorov V A, Panin S I, Postolov M P, Tolstopyatov S E, Panova A V, Puzikova A V, Lyubimov M A, Linchenko A A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To study the factors of delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy using artificial intelligence.
MATERIAL AND METHODS. THE: Study included 142 patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant pancreaticoduodenal tumors. The probability of delayed gastric emptying was determined using neural network analysis (SPSS Statistics v.26). Quality of the model was assessed considering sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic efficacy and AUROC.
RESULTS: Delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy occurred in 33 (23.2%) patients. In multivariate analysis, delayed gastric emptying was associated with BMI > 30 kg/m2, tumor diameter ≤2 cm and postoperative pancreatitis. Model sensitivity was 93.9%, specificity 97.2%, diagnostic efficacy 96.5%, AUROC 0.924±0.011 (95% CI: 0.834-0.967).
CONCLUSION. A: Rtificial intelligence makes it possible to determine the factors of delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS. THE: Study included 142 patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant pancreaticoduodenal tumors. The probability of delayed gastric emptying was determined using neural network analysis (SPSS Statistics v.26). Quality of the model was assessed considering sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic efficacy and AUROC.
RESULTS: Delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy occurred in 33 (23.2%) patients. In multivariate analysis, delayed gastric emptying was associated with BMI > 30 kg/m2, tumor diameter ≤2 cm and postoperative pancreatitis. Model sensitivity was 93.9%, specificity 97.2%, diagnostic efficacy 96.5%, AUROC 0.924±0.011 (95% CI: 0.834-0.967).
CONCLUSION. A: Rtificial intelligence makes it possible to determine the factors of delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy.