Primary ossiculoplasties provide better hearing results than revisions: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of ossicular chain reconstruction (OCR) in primary and revision surgeries, and to investigate the impact of the number of previous surgeries on hearing outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of cases with OCR due to chronic otitis in a tertiary center between January 2018 and September 2021.

RESULTS

Altogether, 147 cases of ossicle involvement were assessed. In 91.83% (n = 135) OCR was performed, 96.26% of them with titanium TORP/PORP (n = 130), two cases with autologous prosthesis and three with piston. Mean follow-up was 8.8 months. The ABG significantly improved in the total group (TORP/PORP) from a mean (SD) of 30.94 (15.55) to 19.76 (13.36) dB (p < 0.0001) with 60.86% success. The best results were achieved in primary OCR with PORP implantation without cholesteatoma (89.47%). Primary cases have a significantly higher success rate in contrary to revision surgeries (72.27%, vs. 52.00%, p = 0.032). The only relevant predictive factor proved to be the fact of revision (p = 0.029). A statistically significant correlation between the number of previous surgeries and hearing results could not be proved. There was no difference in hearing outcomes between patients with only one or more than one previous surgeries in the revision groups. Neither the presence of cholesteatoma, nor the type of OCR (TOPR/PORP) and the indication of revision had an impact on postoperative ABG.

CONCLUSIONS

Titanium prostheses are effective in OCR both in primary and revision cases. It is not the number of previous surgeries, but the fact of revision that influences postoperative hearing results.