MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.24412

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2016

Comparative multidimensional assessment of laryngeal function and quality of life after radiotherapy and laser surgery for early glottic cancer.

Kono Takeyuki, Saito Koichiro, Yabe Haruna, Uno Kosuke, Ogawa Kaoru

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to comparatively assess laryngeal function and quality of life (QOL) of patients after laser surgery (LS) or radiotherapy (RT) for early glottic cancer.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients with T1 glottic cancer treated with RT or type II cordectomy underwent both subjective and objective vocal assessments. The LS group was divided into the following: (1) vaporization with defocused mode (laser surgery [LS]-Vap); and (2) excision with focused mode using lower power (LS-Ex).

RESULTS

Auditory-perceptual evaluation and videostroboscopic images in the LS-Ex group worsened shortly after treatment and time-dependent recovery was quicker than in the LS-Vap group. The LS-Ex group showed equivalent posttherapeutic vocal function with the RT group by acoustics, aerodynamics, and self-assessment questionnaire analysis, whereas the LS-Vap group showed statistically significant worse function.

CONCLUSION

The multidimensional assessment showed that early glottic cancer could be successfully treated by either RT or LS-Ex with equivalent posttherapeutic laryngeal function and QOL. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1085-1090, 2016.

Для цитирования: Kono Takeyuki, Saito Koichiro, Yabe Haruna, Uno Kosuke, Ogawa Kaoru. Comparative multidimensional assessment of laryngeal function and quality of life after radiotherapy and laser surgery for early glottic cancer.. Head & neck. 2016. DOI: 10.1002/hed.24412.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.