MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1292/jvms.14-0258

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2014

Comparison of surgical methods of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion between rats and mice.

Lee Seunghoon, Hong Yunkyung, Park Sookyoung, Lee Sang-Rae, Chang Kyu-Tae, Hong Yonggeun

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Rodent models of focal cerebral ischemia that do not require craniotomy have been developed by intraluminal suture middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo). Mouse MCAo models have been widely used and extended to genetic studies of cell death or recovery mechanisms. Therefore, we compared surgery-related parameters and techniques between such rats and mice. In rodent MCAo models, has to be considered body temperature during the operative period, as well as the need for the use of a standardized tip in terms of the outer diameter of probes. Induction of focal cerebral ischemia was measured by neurological dysfunction parameters. Our methods could induce stable moderate-severity ischemic brain injury models and histological alteration at 24 hr after MCAo surgery. Moreover approximately 80% (rats) and 85% (mice) survival ratios were shown indicating with model engineering success. Finally, we described and compared major parameters between rats and mice, including probe size, thread insert length, operation and occlusion periods, and differences in the procedures.

Для цитирования: Lee Seunghoon, Hong Yunkyung, Park Sookyoung, Lee Sang-Rae, Chang Kyu-Tae, Hong Yonggeun. Comparison of surgical methods of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion between rats and mice.. The Journal of veterinary medical science. 2014. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.14-0258.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.