MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105520

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of dentistry · 2024

Cost-effectiveness-analysis of oral health remotivation and reinstruction in nursing homes in a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Nordblom N F, Hertrampf K, Habig S, Gabelmann S, Schlattmann P, Orawa H, Meyer G, Gaßmann G, Abraham J, Wobst L M, Schwendicke F

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a cluster-randomized-controlled trial (cRCT) in 18 German nursing homes (NH) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of reinstruction and remotivation of nursing staff by dental assistants (DAs) over 13 months.

METHODS

In the intervention arm, dentists examined NH residents, identified oral health conditions, and prescribed individualized oral care interventions. Nursing staff delivered these interventions, with regular follow-up support from DAs (reinstruction and remotivation). In the control group, similar interventions were prescribed via a standardized form, without reinstruction and remotivation (standard of care). The primary outcome was Oral-Health-related Quality-of-Life (OHrQoL) using the Geriatric/General Oral Health Assessment Index (ADD-GOHAI). Secondary outcomes included Health-related Quality-of-Life (HrQoL) using the EQ-5D summary index and caries experience (DMFT index). Costs, including those for staff, materials, and travel, were assessed in Euro 2022. Cost-effectiveness ratios and bootstrapping simulations assessed cost-effectiveness-acceptability at different willingness-to-pay thresholds.

RESULTS

Of 358 recruited participants, 68 and 63 in the intervention and control group completed the study. No significant differences existed between groups in demographics or baseline health measures. After 13 months, changes in ADD-GOHAI and DMFT scores were minimal and non-significant, while EQ-5D scores decreased in the intervention group (p < 0.001). Total costs were higher in the intervention arm (median 121.10 Euro) versus the control (median 0 Euro, p < 0.001), mainly due to travel expenses. The intervention increased dental service use but demonstrated lower cost-effectiveness acceptability.

CONCLUSIONS

DA-led reinstruction did not improve OHrQoL, negatively impacted HrQoL, and increased costs. Notably, our study was suffering from significant attrition, impacting on statistical power.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Reinstruction and remotivation by dental assistants did not improve OHrQoL, but generated significant costs, mainly due to an uptake of dental services.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (Trial registration number NCT04140929).

Для цитирования: Nordblom N F, Hertrampf K, Habig S, Gabelmann S, Schlattmann P, Orawa H, Meyer G, Gaßmann G, Abraham J, Wobst L M, Schwendicke F. Cost-effectiveness-analysis of oral health remotivation and reinstruction in nursing homes in a cluster-randomized controlled trial.. Journal of dentistry. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105520.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.