MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105460

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of dentistry · 2024

Effectiveness of bioactive resin materials in preventing secondary caries and retention loss in direct posterior restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

de Carvalho Luísa Figueredo, Gimenes E Silva Marianna, Barboza Andressa da Silva, Badaró Maurício Malheiros, Stolf Sheila Cristina, Cuevas-Suárez Carlos Enrique, Lund Rafael Guerra, Ribeiro de Andrade Juliana Silva

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to determine whether bioactive resin materials can prevent secondary caries or enhance the longevity of direct posterior restorations.

DATA SOURCES: The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024561179). The review followed PRISMA guidelines, utilizing a PICO framework. Studies were identified through searches in six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Embase, Scielo, Web of Science) up to May 2024.

STUDY SELECTION: Two independent reviewers applied inclusion criteria, selecting randomized clinical trials evaluating bioactive resin composites in restorative dentistry. Data were extracted into pre-designed forms, and article quality was assessed using the CONSORT, RoB 2, and GRADE tools. Meta-analyses focused on secondary caries incidence and restoration longevity using USPHS and FDI criteria.

RESULTS

Of 1,565 articles identified, 10 met the inclusion criteria. These studies, conducted in five countries, included 411 participants with follow-up periods ranging from 1 to 8 years. Materials evaluated included ACTIVA™ BioACTIVE, Giomer, and Cention N. Meta-analysis found no statistically significant differences between bioactive and conventional resin composites in preventing secondary caries or reducing retention loss (p > 0.05), the two primary outcomes considered in this review for assessing restoration longevity. Subgroup analysis showed no differences between follow-up periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Bioactive materials demonstrated similar clinical performance to conventional composites in preventing secondary caries and retaining restorations, offering no additional benefit in enhancing the longevity of direct posterior restorations.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This review provides evidence that bioactive resin materials offer no significant clinical advantage over traditional composites, guiding (or informing) clinicians in (or about) material selection for restorative treatments.

Для цитирования: de Carvalho Luísa Figueredo, Gimenes E Silva Marianna, Barboza Andressa da Silva, Badaró Maurício Malheiros, Stolf Sheila Cristina, Cuevas-Suárez Carlos Enrique, Lund Rafael Guerra, Ribeiro de Andrade Juliana Silva. Effectiveness of bioactive resin materials in preventing secondary caries and retention loss in direct posterior restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Journal of dentistry. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105460.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.