MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2174/1874609811104020171

Медицинская библиотека · Current aging science · 2011

Evolution of specific cognitive subprofiles of mild cognitive impairment in a three-year longitudinal study.

Peraita H, García-Herranz S, Díaz-Mardomingo C

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The present work addresses one of the currently most controversial aspects of early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other dementias; that is, the identification of the Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) syndrome-in some cases, prior to AD-in a sample of older subjects who are healthy from the cognitive viewpoint. In a three-year longitudinal study, we classified the participants between 58 and 90 years of age in different cognitive profiles: healthy and MCI (amnestic MCI, non-amnestic MCI, and multi-domain MCI). We followed the evolution of each one by means of the administration on three occasions of an extensive battery of neuropsychological tests. We have found a high percentage of MCI in our sample. Although some of them were amnestic MCIs, this group was not the most frequent. The multi-domain MCI is the one that evolves directly into AD, not the amnestic MCIs. We have found diverse evolutional trajectories over the past three years, some expected, others somewhat unexpected. We also point out the methodological difficulties posed by the administration of certain episodic memory tests, which is not the most appropriate to detect subclinical MCI, due to the effect of practice.

Для цитирования: Peraita H, García-Herranz S, Díaz-Mardomingo C. Evolution of specific cognitive subprofiles of mild cognitive impairment in a three-year longitudinal study.. Current aging science. 2011. DOI: 10.2174/1874609811104020171.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.