DOI 10.2340/17453674.2025.44248
Machine learning-based prediction of short- and long-term mortality for shared decision-making in older hip fracture patients: the Dutch Hip Fracture Audit algorithms in 74,396 cases.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatment-related shared decision-making (SDM) in older adults with hip fractures is complex due to the need to balance patient-specific factors such as life goals, frailty, and surgical risks. It includes considerations such as prognosis and decisions concerning whether to operate or not on frail, life-limited patients. We aimed to develop machine learning (ML)-driven prediction models for short- and long-term mortality in a large cohort of patients with hip fractures.
METHODS
In this national registry-based retrospective cohort study, patients aged ≥ 70 years registered in the nationwide Dutch Hip Fracture Audit from 2018-2023 were included. Predictive variables were selected based on the literature and/or clinical relevance. 6 ML algorithms, including logistic regression, were trained with internal cross-validation and evaluated on discrimination (c-statistic), sensitivity, specificity, calibration, and interpretability.
RESULTS
74,396 patients (median age 84, IQR 78-89; 68% female) were analyzed. Most patients lived at home (69%) and high malnutrition risk was seen in 10%. 18% had dementia. Mortality rates were 9.1% (30-day), 15% (90-day), and 26% (1-year). Logistic regression performed comparably to other algorithms, but was chosen as the preferred algorithm due to its superior interpretability (c-statistic: 30-day 0.82, 90-day 0.81, 1-year 0.80).
CONCLUSION
We developed and validated ML algorithms, including logistic regression, for mortality prediction in older hip fracture patients with adequate performance. This information may inform SDM.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.