MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amj.2023.07.012

Медицинская библиотека · Air medical journal · 2023

Quality Review of Prone Patient Transport Protocol.

Hersey David, Witter Tobias, Kovacs George

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This is a retrospective quality review of LifeFlight Nova Scotia's prone patient transport protocol.

METHODS

Electronic patient care records were queried for acute respiratory distress syndrome, prone position, proning, supine to prone, and prone to prone between February 2017 and June 2022. Eligible electronic patient care records were reviewed for demographics (sex, age, and weight); method of transports (ambulance, rotor wing, or fixed wing); duration of transports; mechanical ventilation parameters; medication infusions; arterial blood gases; occurrences of mild hypoxemia (any oxygen saturation [SpO2] < 88% or decrease in SpO2 > 5%); hypotension (any episode of MAP < 65 mm Hg); severe hypoxemia (any SpO2 < 80% or decrease in SpO2 > 10%); refractory hypotension (mean arterial pressure < 65 mm Hg not responsive to vasopressor/inotropes); cardiac arrests; and displacement of central lines, arterial lines, and endotracheal tubes.

RESULTS

Seventeen prone patients were transported by ambulance, rotor wing, and fixed wing with 4 occurrences of mild hypotension, 4 occurrences of mild hypoxemia, and 1 occurrence of refractory hypotension.

CONCLUSION

Interfacility transfer of prone patients by a dedicated critical care team is feasible with minimal adverse occurrences while ensuring patients have access to the specialized lifesaving care they require.

Для цитирования: Hersey David, Witter Tobias, Kovacs George. Quality Review of Prone Patient Transport Protocol.. Air medical journal. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.amj.2023.07.012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.