Clinical oral investigations · 2025
Efficacy of collagenated bone substitutes for bone regeneration in two-wall-damaged extraction sockets without barrier membranes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jeong Seungho, Strauss Franz J, Shin Hae Jee, Park Jin-Young, Cha Jae-Kook, Lee Jung-Seok
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate ridge dimensional changes following alveolar ridge augmentation in two-wall-damaged extraction sockets without a barrier membrane, using two types of collagenated bone substitutes i. cross-linked (CL-CB) and ii. non-cross-linked (NCL-CB).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two-wall defects were created in mandibles of seven beagle dogs and treated in three groups: (i) no grafting (control), (ii) sockets filled with NCL-CB, and (iii) sockets filled with CL-CB. No barrier membrane was used. One animal was sacrificed after 1 week of healing for tissue assessments (n = 1), and the other six were sacrificed after 8 weeks of healing for microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) and histological analyses (n = 6).
RESULTS: Compared to unextracted sites, radiographic analysis revealed that the alveolar ridge dimension decreased to 83.29 ± 24.96% in group NCL-CB, 73.46 ± 16.59% in group CL-CB and 55.41 ± 12.95% in non-grafted sites (intergroup p = 0.062). Histological analysis showed that compared to baseline values the ridge area decreased to 68.75 ± 14.20% in the non-grafted group, 79.88 ± 20.05% in the NCL-CB group and 76.10 ± 21.09% in the CL-CB group with no significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05). Qualitative histological analyses revealed significantly less mineralized tissue in both test groups, amounting to 25.28 ± 10.40% in group NCL-CB, 29.86 ± 12.04% in group CL-CB, and 67.15 ± 14.35% in non-grafted sites (intergroup p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The efficacy of alveolar ridge augmentation using either cross-linked or non-cross-linked collagenated bone substitutes alone might be limited in severely damaged sockets such as those with two-wall defects.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In situations where sockets are extensively damaged, like those with two-wall defects, relying solely on soft-type bone block substitutes without a barrier membrane may not provide sufficient bone regeneration. This study highlights the importance of considering additional regenerative strategies, such as the use of barrier membranes, to enhance clinical outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two-wall defects were created in mandibles of seven beagle dogs and treated in three groups: (i) no grafting (control), (ii) sockets filled with NCL-CB, and (iii) sockets filled with CL-CB. No barrier membrane was used. One animal was sacrificed after 1 week of healing for tissue assessments (n = 1), and the other six were sacrificed after 8 weeks of healing for microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) and histological analyses (n = 6).
RESULTS: Compared to unextracted sites, radiographic analysis revealed that the alveolar ridge dimension decreased to 83.29 ± 24.96% in group NCL-CB, 73.46 ± 16.59% in group CL-CB and 55.41 ± 12.95% in non-grafted sites (intergroup p = 0.062). Histological analysis showed that compared to baseline values the ridge area decreased to 68.75 ± 14.20% in the non-grafted group, 79.88 ± 20.05% in the NCL-CB group and 76.10 ± 21.09% in the CL-CB group with no significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05). Qualitative histological analyses revealed significantly less mineralized tissue in both test groups, amounting to 25.28 ± 10.40% in group NCL-CB, 29.86 ± 12.04% in group CL-CB, and 67.15 ± 14.35% in non-grafted sites (intergroup p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The efficacy of alveolar ridge augmentation using either cross-linked or non-cross-linked collagenated bone substitutes alone might be limited in severely damaged sockets such as those with two-wall defects.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In situations where sockets are extensively damaged, like those with two-wall defects, relying solely on soft-type bone block substitutes without a barrier membrane may not provide sufficient bone regeneration. This study highlights the importance of considering additional regenerative strategies, such as the use of barrier membranes, to enhance clinical outcomes.