Quantitative pixel grey measurement of the "high-risk" sign, darkening of third molar roots: a pilot study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Our aim was to examine the panoramic darkening of the root, which is a "high-risk" sign, using quantitative measurements of pixel grey values to determine different aetiological backgrounds, namely inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) exposure with or without groove formation of the third molar roots or thinning/fenestration of the lingual cortex (LCTF).
METHODS
38 impacted third molars that had been surgically removed and had darkened roots on panoramic radiographs were included in this retrospective case-control study. 15 IAN exposure cases were selected for the case group, and 23 cases with proven lingual cortical thinning or fenestration were chosen for the control group. The mean pixel grey values of selected areas in the dark band (D) and control areas within the same roots (R) were determined with the ImageTool (University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX) software. The differences in pixel values (R-D) of the IAN and LCTF groups were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U-test and Pearson's χ(2) test.
RESULTS
The medians of the R-D pixel values were 45.7 in the IAN group and 34.3 in the LCTF group, whereas the interquartile ranges were 12.0 (IAN) and 18.3 (LCTF) (p < 0.001). The R-D critical value at which the outcomes differed significantly was 38. If the differences in pixel grey values (R-D) were higher than 38, the chance of IAN exposure was approximately 32 times higher than the chance of LCTF (χ(2) test, p < 0.001; odds ratio, 32.0; 95% confidence interval, 3.5-293.1).
CONCLUSIONS
The pre-operative prediction of IAN exposure or lingual cortical thinning in cases with "darkening" is possible based on pixel grey measurements of digital panoramic radiographs.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.